This is the second part of the series.

* * * * *

Prejudice vs. Prejudice

Dismayed by the nature and the number of insults flung at Malu Fernandez, I’m more appalled by the justification some bloggers offered for continually assaulting this woman’s weight problem as an outlet for their hatred. They said that it isn’t bigotry or prejudice to criticize this woman for her obesity since it is a health problem and everybody should strive for a healthy size.

While it isn’t prejudice or bigotry to point out the growing problem of obesity in the country, to single out an individual and ridicule that person for being overweight is pretentious and unethical (if I know better, some of these people who made these remarks are obese too). Some tried to justify it some more by saying the word “pig” was not made in reference to her body size but in reference to her behavior which is “dirty” or “pig-like”.

Oh, did they really? Let’s take a sample of those comments:

eh kahit nga ako ng 50 kg lang halos
di na magkasya sa liit ng upuan emirates sya pa kaya
na mukhang balyena?

For everybody’s information, nag apply akong NANNY o DH before dito, hindi ako tinanggap, kasi mataas ang standards nila sa Domestic Helper. Yun bang mukhang mapagkakatiwalaan at maganda ang asal para maganda ang matutunan ng anak nila. Kaya I’m sure Malu Fernandez, hindi ka makakapasa bilang DH. Kasi ayaw nilang maging kasing taba mo ang anak nila. Yun lang.

If your rich and your ugly, its your fault, So kung eletista at mayaman sya, baket ganun ang face nya lalo na body nya?

Sabi ng classmate ko kaya daw nagsugat ang legs eh di kasya sa seat, ang taba taba nya, kakahiya syang itabi sa mga DH na sexy and beautiful.

sana ikaw nalang isang lahi sa lahi ninyo. sana dika na magkaanak baka magmana pa sa iyong masamang pagtanaw sa buhay. tingnan mu nga ang sarili mo sa salamin, palagay maganda ka?, hoy mataba ka para kang aparador kung sa muebles.

These are the tamer comments that I can find. Can you still tell me that this isn’t bigotry?

(This aspect of this issue is a foreboding that there’s still a problem in size acceptance in this country. While that we don’t ridicule our friends for being obese, anyone who’d say they haven’t enjoyed throwing out fat jokes involving strangers or someone hated is a hypocrite. I wonder what the International Size Acceptance Association or ISAA Philippines can say about this.)

Though most will say she deserve it because she’s insulted OFWs, I don’t think it will be necessary that we turn into bigots too just to extract justice from what she’s done. Why do you have to become the bigot which you’re accusing her of becoming when she wrote that article?

Again, most people will try to excuse themselves for throwing those invectives by saying they have become “emotional”. No, it isn’t a valid excuse. While we do know that we are human beings capable of emotions, we are also rational beings. Why go down to being deranged animals when you are a human being?

Should It Be Emotions Vs. Rationalization?

Somebody said that this Malu Fernandez issue is an emotional issue because what she said stirred emotions of anger and hate among the OFWs and other Filipinos and that this could not be settled logically because Malu did not have a logical case in the first place. Now there’s a great fallacy for you, folks. While I do think that those who’re irrational would not listen to the more reasonable thinking of those who’re clear-headed enough and that Malu Fernandez may have yet to straighten certain “facts” she harbor about OFWs, it must be considered that, like any other arguments, this can be settled by pointing out the fallacies to Malu and to those who may be clear-headed enough to do something about it. She may have become unreasonable in some aspects but she’s an educated adult. If many people will point out her mistakes decently, she would have come at the conclusion that she did wrong. That is the way adults should be dealing with the issue.

Another thing is that people have this misconception that rationalization is devoid of emotions. And that being emotional is not part of rationalization. This is false. When a rational human being reasons out, he acknowledges how an issue makes him feel and uses these emotions to make a decision on what to do with it and with the source of such emotions.

So, for people who likes using the “emotional excuse” to wriggle out of responsibility for what they have done or said, well, I’m not buying it. That’s just the result of too much TV drama, I’d say.

Was It Fair?

So, Malu Fernandez has finally resigned (only from People Asia Magazine, though). It was the goal of many bloggers and the OFW community that she had offended with her writings. But was the manner by which this goal was attained fair?

On one hand, it has been fair because both sides have been given the chance to air their concerns and sentiments. Malu was given the chance to air her side through her “apology” statement. The complainers were able to get their messages across by posting on blogs, forums, and through emails to the publishers and editors involved. On the other hand, I think, it has been quite unfair, too, because of the manner by which the lynch mob went after her. I do think the harassment she received in forms of blogs and comments that reek of hatred, curses, and violence (reportedly, she received death threats but nobody has verified this with evidence) was just a tad too much.

Yes, she hurt the pride of the Filipinos in the OFWs. But was that enough reason that we forget that we are human beings and we are dealing with another human being? Was that enough justification that we forget that we are rational beings and not animals? Does that justify our bigotry towards this woman?

Moving On

I think this Malu Fernandez issue has become one of the turning points in Philippine blogging history. Not that remarkable, though, in terms of the goal attained (resignation of a columnist) but, still notable, as to the process by which we arrived at the conclusion.

We have thrown a lot of hurtful words around and it is time to take control of the rage and see the problem for what it is. It is quite disappointing that, in an effort to fight for an injured pride, a lot of Malu Fernandezes sprung up.  And the rage exhibited by the mob reminded me much of the boys in Lord of the Flies. But like most things, this are not permanent and can still be changed. It is important that everybody take what we could learn from this and analyze how this issue has affected ourselves and the way we blog and live.

So, for now, we must move on to more important issues that we need to turn our attention to.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
19 Responses to “Closing The Chapter On The Malu Fernandez Issue, Part 2: Prejudice Vs. Prejudice and Emotions Vs. Rationalization”
  1. Tubag Bohol Says:

    The comments made by Filipinos, no matter how harsh, are justified. Did Malu use noble words when she maligned the OFWs?

    Good for her, the Filipinos are only using words to fight back.

    If she’s in another country, she might be assassinated by the radicals. Some nationals cannot take it when their own would put them down. So they erase these unpatriotic people off the face of the earth.

  2. sparks Says:

    She’s coming back to write for MST. If they run her column on Monday, what does that mean?

  3. ganns Says:

    Every human being has certain inalienable human rights, including the rights to dignity and respect. If another human being violates those inalienable human rights, that human being deserves to be properly chastised/punished, but in ways that do not violate that human being’s rights to dignity and respect. In their anger, Many Filipinos have trampled violently on Malu’s rights in the name of justice.

    Lynching another human being in real or virtual circumstance is neither just nor justified.

    I applaud Dr. Termulo for sticking to her guns and remaining rational and calm in the face of the angry mob. I agree with every point and join her in calling for an end to this issue.

  4. L.A Says:

    It’s a good point to stop and close this particular issue, it has become the center of jokes for Malu and his physical appearance. For now I can only think that being rational at the first place would still make you safe for a long long time.

  5. Prudence Says:

    to Tubag Bohol:

    “Did Malu use noble words when she maligned the OFWs?”

    — So it’s an eye for an eye then? Why go down to the level of which you have condemned her to be? Insulting and ridiculing a person through words may not be criminal, but it is certainly not reasonable.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if in the near future, this country would resort to lynching in administering “justice” to all offenders.

    “If she’s in another country, she might be assassinated by the radicals. Some nationals cannot take it when their own would put them down. So they erase these unpatriotic people off the face of the earth.”

    — So do you want it to be that way in this country?

  6. Prudence Says:

    to sparks:

    It means that she’s still allowed to write in Manila Standard. That simple. I already mentioned in the post that she’s only resigned from People Asia Magazine. I think it’s better that she’s still going to write for MST. That way, she’ll be given another chance to correct her mistakes and so that the people may “monitor” if she really was going to be sincere in not writing any hurtful article in the future.

  7. Prudence Says:

    to ganns:

    Thanks for the support. It’s just so hard to convince people to be reasonable. They’re blinded by their hatred and they seem to believe that it’s a valid excuse. No, it’s not. It can make us understand why they behaved that way but it will never make it justifiable.

  8. Prudence Says:

    to L.A.:

    You’re right. There are other more important issues that we should put our attention into. Like the recent murder of Cris Mendez. Poor guy. Now I just have to post something about that, though it’ll be a bit short because I’m a little pressed for time.

  9. hazel Says:

    “Did Malu use noble words when she maligned the OFWs?”
    –No. But do we necessarily have to sink to her level?
    We already established that Malu is a bigoted, elitist bitch so that’s that. The woman issued a public apology. Manila Standard opted to keep her: so what? Don’t buy the newspaper or don’t read her column. Let’s move on… there are bigger, far more important issues than Malu’s “acerbic wit”.

    Prudence, thanks for being among the few who actually treated this issue with some dignity.

  10. Jon Limjap Says:

    Bravo, tess, Bravo :smile:
    I love how you objectively treated this issue.

    I agree that it might actually be a good thing that she continues to write for MST. It will show us if she has changed, it gives her the opportunity to prove and redeem herself as a person and as a writer.

    I think everyone needs a fair chance.

    We will see.

  11. noemi Says:

    Hopefully lessons have been learned. I too have learned that comments can get out of hand. Think about my last controversial entry. The whole point of my original entry was totally mangled. It’s really a dilemma on freedom of expression and the dignity and respect of the subject matter.

  12. Prudence Says:

    to hazel:

    Thanks. It’s just unfortunate that some people refuse to be reasonable.

  13. Prudence Says:

    to Jon Limjap:

    People just refuse to see that the idea of mere punishment shouldn’t just be the goal, but rather, there should also a “rehabilitation” part as well. You are right. We all deserve a fair chance to prove ourselves worthy.

  14. Prudence Says:

    to Noemi:

    Yes, lessons are the most important thing. We all make mistakes, but what we do with those mistakes can show what character we have.

    About freedom of expression, people just have the misconception that the right to freedom of expression is absolute freedom. Of course, this is false. An “absolute” freedom will only lead to perpetual chaos because nobody will be responsible for all their words and actions, attributing all such responsibilities to “freedom”

  15. Janet Says:

    Ms Prudence, it’s so niec to see a blog like this.

    What many people failed to realize, Malu is just a product of our culture. Isn’t it that up to now, we still make fun of the Filipino-Chinese community? Isn’t it that we poke call dark skinned FIlipino as aetas and and and WE TOLERATE IT! Isn’t it hypocrisy to call Malu a bigot, racist to her own people when in FACT do the same?

    Maybe the existence of Malu and people like her in our society is na national karma?? We condemn Malu but we never really condemned discrimination. At a certain point, we even praise such acts. Just look at our midea — how dark skinned Pinoys are made fun of(Diego and MIka of Bubble Gang), how me make fun of the Indian Nationals(calling them five-six, mabaho, making a nasty music video about them — Michael V’s DJ Bumbay). Come on, what’s more plastic that than?

    if we do not want people like Malu to exist in our society, we should therefore REFORM our culture. Calling Malu names just open a can of worms.

  16. Prudence Says:

    to Janet:

    Thanks so much.

    It’s unfortunate that people refuse to be reasonable. And it’s a wonder why. These are hypocrites who wouldn’t even acknowledge that they, too, have their prejudices. Maybe it’s part of the culture of the Filipinos. But still, we can choose to change this part of our culture if we want to. But some people wouldn’t even acknowledge it, so how can we do something about it if people deny it even exists?

  17. Tubag Bohol Says:

    Many don’t really get the point. And all the talks are non-sense.

    If you want to summarize their rebuttal, it all lead to defending Malu Fernandez.

    But I never read a comment that sympathize the OFWs.

    All praise still goes to Malu.

    What a country of heartless Filipinos.

  18. ganns Says:

    What?? Hello, have you read the hundreds of other local blogs out there?

    You’ll find that Dr Tess and other Filipinos who call for a rational way in dealing with Malu are definitely in the minority.

    And excuse me, if most angry Filipinos pick on another Filipino, regardless of whether or not that anger is justified, does that mean they aren’t heartless as well?

    Don’t mistake mob mentality for justice, name-calling for rationality, and carelessly flung harsh words as an excuse to subvert another human being’s right to dignity.

  19. dementia Says:

    ISAA Ph comment about the Malu issue on its blog.

Leave a Reply